OFF TOPIC
Arlan Ashald escribió:
Para mr james:
Leete en meristation la comparativa bioshock xbox vs ps3. Pueds ver fotos y el analisis tecnico,ps3 caidas d frame Rate q xbox no tiene y texuras d peor calidad SOLO M REMITO A PONER LO Q DICE Y MUESTRA EL ARTICULO.y en fallout 3 ve el analisis d gameprotv hacen en el video una comparacion a pantalla partida y la paliza lo dice la propia redactora es bestial en texturas,iluminacion y frame rate.informate antes d hablar ..
Pero que si quieres puedo citarte mas juegos.. Battlefield bad company sin efecto relieve en el suelo, Lost planet (sin comentarios xD un destrozo y mil meses tarde), Turok peores texturas y menos elementos en pantalla como vegetacion...
hace años que no veo los reviews de meristation, prefiero los de IGN y GameSpot, aunque con esto no digo que sean malos
cito el de IGN
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/920/920389p1.htmlel de GameSpot no hace una comparativa en si por eso no lo cito
y disculpa pero lo dicho, el review de meristation no hace mencion de las texturas de mayor resolucion que se incluyeron en esta version, las caidas de framerate y los viejos glitchs que hereda de 360, incluso dice que la version de 360 no los tiene, y para rematar incluso pone fotografias del glitch de la textura de big daddy que como dije fue correjido para la version final junto con algunos glitches que se le critico al demo
cito la comparativa de IGN
However, what does detract from the gameplay is the fact that there are a number of technical issues that should have been ironed out in the extra year of development time that the PS3 version has had. For one thing, the slowdown that cropped up in the 360 version of the game is still present within the PS3 version, and is inexcusable in just how frequent it occurs. It's strange when you're facing off against one particular splicer and the game's framerate stutters, but when you get into an area with a Big Daddy and a few Nitro Splicers, the slowdown can hitch the game for three or more seconds thanks to the explosions and actions of each creature. That's just horrible, and should've been fixed instead of ported over.
Similarly, object detection issues remain, as you'll find Pep Bars, bags of chips and other items sticking through desks and into drawers, or halfway in and out of crates or other containers. Even stranger is the fact that you'll find some firearms dropped from killed enemies that you can plainly see but not pick up the guns to collect their bullets. While the amount of bodies that twitch after an enemy has been killed has been dramatically reduced, you'll still run into a couple of enemies that will vibrate and shake with post-mortem seizures.
What's more, the Little Sister glitch returns with the PS3 version. This isn't nearly as bad as the other problems that I just mentioned, particularly because you can gain extra Adam to purchase extra plasmids in the game, but it does stand out as a glitch nestled in a load of technical problems from last year's experience. Were this to be considered the definitive BioShock experience, you'd think that many of these bugs would've been fixed, or at least explainable as to why they're still in the game. As they currently exist, they seem to be more like a carryover from a bad port of the title.
This can also be said about some of the visuals within the game, which have received a number of enhancements, but also suffer from older, less impressive texture work. 2K Games went out of their way to make sure that the larger capacity of the Blu-ray was used to implement higher resolution textures across the title, as well as improve some of the in-game cutscenes. For the most part, you'll see these appear as a slightly sharper Rapture across the board, and you'll be able to pick up some features that look better than on the 360, such as pools of water or neon signage. However, there does appear to be a strange mix of the older textures scattered in the title as well, so you'll find quite a lot of texture pop in that will occur as you move through levels. This isn't solely as you load up a new level; this can occur even as you move through a section. It doesn't ruin the game's beauty in the slightest, but it does stick out like a sore thumb at times.
Closing Comments
If you never experienced the halls of Rapture and have been waiting for its appearance on the PS3, there really is no discussion to be had. Go out and get your hands on BioShock -- you will thoroughly enjoy exploring the incredible story and the excellent action that the game is known for. However, if you've played the game before, or are expecting this to be the definitive version, that's can't be found here. Sure, the full trophy support and Survivor mode are great, and the Challenge Rooms could add a ton to the replayability (whenever it's implemented). However, old glitches that should've been fixed in the PS3 development hold this version back from being completely realized.
en otros foros puedes ver opiniones similares
la unica explicacion que encuentro es que Meristation no se puso en contancto con los desarrolladores para obtener informacion sobre el update de las texturas y una version final para hacer una verdadera comparativa ademas de no haber hecho una comparacion verdadera de 360 pues se omitieron los "glitches" de esa version diciendo que no los presentaba cuando fue algo criticado en los foros, igualmente las imagenes de ps3 estan en casi todas alejadas de los objetos que son comparados como los anuncios aunque eso no es que sea importante pues no se trata de la version final
aunque como se ve tienen las cajas , sera un review que ya tenian listo o que?
aunque no es raro que algunas paginas digamos no tan grandes hagan algunos reviews en base a demos incompletas para ser los primeros, no digo que siempre lo hagan o que lo hayan hecho
gracias por los links, aunque siendo sinceros las partes que citas asi de entrada no me dicen mucho como para una comparacion seria ya que no especifica detalles y con lo de bioshock pues las veo algo dudosas
Arlan Ashald escribió:P.D: Siento este offtopic pero ver que la gente habla sin pruebas o sin informarse me da mucha rabia. un saludo y no saldre mas con este asunto.
ok...
pero no entiendo por que te da rabia entonces
como lo dige antes yo me base en la comparativa de los reviews de IGN, GameSpot entre otras asi como sus foros, tu pones una comparativa de Meristation
tienes las mismas bases que yo(una pagina) la diferencia es que yo me baso en IGN y tu en Meristation
disculpa pero siendo esas tus razones no entiendo por que te da rabia mi comentario no es muy diferente al tuyo simplemente lo que digo, esa comparacion no concuerda con la mayoria de paginas y de varios foros que e revisado
fin del offtopic
![[carcajad]](/images/smilies/nuevos/risa_ani2.gif "carcajada")
![[+risas]](/images/smilies/nuevos/risa_ani3.gif "más risas")
![[sonrisa]](/images/smilies/nuevos/risa_ani1.gif "sonrisa")
.
![[qmparto]](/images/smilies/net_quemeparto.gif "Que me parto!")
Si claro, y mis cojones treinta y tres...Gow utiliza una alta poligonización, y virtual displacemente maping, al que con respecto al 1 han añadido el tema del deferred rendering ( según mi forma de ver, ciclos de gpu que no aportan demasiado rendimiento visual)aparte de normal maps y algunas texturas cojonudas sip...A eso, le unimos un sistema de iluminación a base de lightmpas standard en la mayoría de interiores ( al menos lo que yo he visto, y no quiero ver más para spoilearme el juego), a lo que hay que unir, hasta donde yo he visto, un sistema de sombreado de shadow maps, nuevamente PRECALCULADAS, ( al igual que en el 1). Y creo que mejor no comentar el tema animiaciones, fisica de impactos / fisicas de elementos estáticos, solo aspecto visual apreciable en capturas / videos.
.
