+1 para Blu-ray vídeo

Carbunco escribió:Si, se calcula que la "resolución" del negativo cinematográfico se cubriría con 4000 líneas horizontales. Vamos, 4000p

Carbunco escribió:El cálculo esta basado en los cristales que forman la base del revelado del negativo cinematográfico de 35mm. No es un dato que me invente, es una estimación que he leido en varios sitios.

Naturalmente un negativo de 70mm daría mucho juego (sólo imaginar Baraka escaneada a más de 4000 líneas....).

Los proyectore digitales en cines españoles son todos 2k (2000 líneas). Al menos la última vez que me informé sobre el tema. Ignoro si alguna sala ha comprado proyectores 4k, que ya hay alguno disponible.


Lo único para lo que sirve el dato es para que os conciencieis de que en unos años las distribuidoras aparecerán con el formato "Ultra-HD", que estará en 4000p y nos volverán a vender otra vez su catálogo.


Que los 1080p están muy bien, pero que es una solución intermedia hacia el verdadero cine en casa.

the iniston escribió:aver, quesi, que tu puedes cojer una peli del año que sea y ponerle la resolucion que te salga de ahy,pero que no es lo mismo, esas pelis no dan la calidad que podria dar un bd o un hddvd, creo que no estoy siendo capaz de explicarme,esas pelis tiene 1080 lineas? pues si, de eso no hay duda,¿son hd? pues no,que tengan esa resolucion, no quiere decir que tengan buena dfinicion.

Presented in a 1.78:1 aspect ratio and 1080p/VC-1 video (and on a BD-50 dual-layer disc, no less), Warner has done a remarkable job in rescuing 'The Searchers,' and this Blu-ray version is currently the best-looking classic catalog title on the format by far. Quite frankly, this transfer looks cleaner than some recent releases with $100 million dollar production budgets -- there is just something breathtaking about seeing a fifty-year-old film that looks as smooth and clear as this.

Presented in 2.35:1 widescreen and 1080p/VC-1 video, the source print is near pristine. The richness of color was a real surprise. Hues are vibrant and clean, but not oversaturated the way so many remasters are, in a vain effort to "modernize" a transfer. From the ornate interiors of the church and wedding hall, to the mountain ranges of the first act deer hunt, the image can be truly beautiful. Contrast is quite punchy, with deep blacks and bright highs, which offers an immediately noticeable improvement in terms of depth and detail over past video versions. (Compared to my crappy first-edition DVD release, it truly is a revelation.) Digital tweaks have also been kept to a minimum, with little artificial edginess to ruin the film-like texture, though a slight bit of noise in solid patches, such as wide-open skylines, is noticeable.

Casablanca' is presented in 1080p/VC-1 video and appropriately pillarboxed to the film's original theatrical aspect ratio of 1.33:1. The black and white image is wonderful. The source material has been meticulously cleaned up, and good luck finding a speck of dirt, dropouts or inconsistencies in contrast or black levels. The film has a nice, deep and rich look, with excellent smoothness across the entire grayscale. Sharpness is perhaps slightly "soft" by today's standards, but terrific for a film from 1942. I continue to marvel at how deep and detailed this film looks. Fine textures throughout are clearly visible -- I could make out indentations on the spine of a book, or see slight creases in the clean whites of Humphrey Bogart's tuxedo. I am also grateful Warner didn't over-tweak this one -- whites never bloom and at no point is the image overly contrasted in an effort to make the film look "newer" or "glossier." Instead, 'Casablanca' maintains a very natural, film-like look throughout. Without a doubt this is the finest black and white transfer I've seen on high-def, period, and up there with the best remasters ever created for the home theater environment.