1080p por componentes x HDMI ??

No existe 1080p por componente.

hernan360 escribió:No existe 1080p por componente.

eso sera en tu consola, en la del resto, si xD

la diferencia principal es que el cable por componentes, no alcanza esta resolucion con la misma calidad que un HDMI, y los colores son mas irrealistas en un componentes, aunque eso si, mucho más vivos.

Perdon, me confundi y me explique mal.
La 360 soporta 1080p por componente.
La mayoria de las tvs no soportan 1080p por componente.
No se convirtio en un standard el 1080p, pero algunos fabricantes (como microsoft) lo implantaron en sus productos.

----------------------------

1080p over component video standard proposed to the CEA
Wednesday, 15 August 2007

There is no official standard for delivering 1080p over analog, even though it can be done. The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) may change that.



High definition analog component video is defined by the CEA specification, CEA-770.3-rev C. The spec was last revised five years ago, and defines 720p and 1080i, but not 1080p.

Even in the absence of a standard, however, 1080p component video has made its way into a surprising amount of consumer devices. Several display manufacturers support 1080p over component video, either across the line such as Samsung, or as an undocumented feature on certain models such as Syntax/Brillian’s.

Many networked media players, such as those from PixelMagic Systems and Ziova, will output 1080p via component, as will Media Center PCs.

However, the most significant source devices are the major gaming consoles, with both the Playstation 3 and the Xbox 360 supporting 1080p analog.

The game consoles have a restriction: They will limit the analog ouput to 1080i for AACS protected movie playback as found on HD DVD and Blu-ray discs. There is a technical side to that story though.

HD DVD and Blu-ray movies are typically encoded in 1080p/24 Hz. In order to output the film over 1080i/60 Hz, the content is staggered into the 3:2 pulldown sequence to make up for the frame rate difference, and interlaced to 60 fields/sec.

In this process, all of the pixel information is intact, and nothing should be thrown away. For whatever reason, the AACS license is OK with this information traveling over the analog component video interface as 1080i/60Hz, unprotected from those pesky pirates.

Inside a typical 1080p flat panel display, a video processor receives this, and goes about the job of de-interlacing and reverse 3:2 pulldown, where 100% of the original pixels can be recovered (in the higher quality displays, cheaper ones tend to mess this up).

A proposal to add 1080p at 24, 30, and 60 Hz has been submitted to the CEA, technical analysis of cable & connectors has been completed & market demand has been identified. Next comes the comment and review periods, committee approval, and if all of that goes smoothly, publishing of CEA-770.3 rev D.

Just adding it to the spec, of course, does not change the AACS license requirements for an analog limit of 1080i on next-gen discs. Nor does it change many minds in Hollywood on the “analog hole,” so don’t expect 1080p analog out of a disc player just yet.

------------------

Pd.:
Incluso si usan un poco de google van a ver que hay muchas contradixxxiones con respecto a este tema. La unica seguridad es enchufarlo y probarlo.
Incluso en wikipedia en un articulo dice 1080i, en otro 1080p, y distintas idas y vueltas.

Perdon y saludos.

Macho eres una fuente de sabiduria....

hernan360 escribió:Perdon, me confundi y me explique mal.
La 360 soporta 1080p por componente.
La mayoria de las tvs no soportan 1080p por componente.
No se convirtio en un standard el 1080p, pero algunos fabricantes (como microsoft) lo implantaron en sus productos.

----------------------------

1080p over component video standard proposed to the CEA
Wednesday, 15 August 2007

There is no official standard for delivering 1080p over analog, even though it can be done. The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) may change that.



High definition analog component video is defined by the CEA specification, CEA-770.3-rev C. The spec was last revised five years ago, and defines 720p and 1080i, but not 1080p.

Even in the absence of a standard, however, 1080p component video has made its way into a surprising amount of consumer devices. Several display manufacturers support 1080p over component video, either across the line such as Samsung, or as an undocumented feature on certain models such as Syntax/Brillian’s.

Many networked media players, such as those from PixelMagic Systems and Ziova, will output 1080p via component, as will Media Center PCs.

However, the most significant source devices are the major gaming consoles, with both the Playstation 3 and the Xbox 360 supporting 1080p analog.

The game consoles have a restriction: They will limit the analog ouput to 1080i for AACS protected movie playback as found on HD DVD and Blu-ray discs. There is a technical side to that story though.

HD DVD and Blu-ray movies are typically encoded in 1080p/24 Hz. In order to output the film over 1080i/60 Hz, the content is staggered into the 3:2 pulldown sequence to make up for the frame rate difference, and interlaced to 60 fields/sec.

In this process, all of the pixel information is intact, and nothing should be thrown away. For whatever reason, the AACS license is OK with this information traveling over the analog component video interface as 1080i/60Hz, unprotected from those pesky pirates.

Inside a typical 1080p flat panel display, a video processor receives this, and goes about the job of de-interlacing and reverse 3:2 pulldown, where 100% of the original pixels can be recovered (in the higher quality displays, cheaper ones tend to mess this up).

A proposal to add 1080p at 24, 30, and 60 Hz has been submitted to the CEA, technical analysis of cable & connectors has been completed & market demand has been identified. Next comes the comment and review periods, committee approval, and if all of that goes smoothly, publishing of CEA-770.3 rev D.

Just adding it to the spec, of course, does not change the AACS license requirements for an analog limit of 1080i on next-gen discs. Nor does it change many minds in Hollywood on the “analog hole,” so don’t expect 1080p analog out of a disc player just yet.

------------------

Pd.:
Incluso si usan un poco de google van a ver que hay muchas contradixxxiones con respecto a este tema. La unica seguridad es enchufarlo y probarlo.
Incluso en wikipedia en un articulo dice 1080i, en otro 1080p, y distintas idas y vueltas.

Perdon y saludos.

Pues la xbox 360, permite 1080p por componentes, pero es mucho mejor por High Definition Multimedia Interface (HDMI)

vegetasnake escribió:Macho eres una fuente de sabiduria....

Jua, gracias, pero usar google no es inteligencia.

...Ya lo se....pero anima.

vegetasnake escribió:...Ya lo se....pero anima.

No avia que escribir tanta bobada.
Componentes es HD pero es Analogo.
HDMI es HD pero Digital.
Y digital es mejor que analogo punto.Y por si alguien pregunta el VGA es HD pero tambien es Analogo y es peor que el componente.

HDMI: Interfaz multimedia de alta definicion(digital), existe hasta la revisión 1.4, q ya soporta 3D y resoluciones de 4096 × 2160 a 24 fps o de 3840 × 2160 a 30 fps, cuando se habla de 1080, nos encontramos con:
1080p(progressive scan) o 1080i(entrelazada)
FullHD 1920x1080 2.073.600 pixels(utilizada para HDMI)
HDTV 960x1080 1.036.800 pixels(analogica utilizada en Componentes YCbCr)

Saludos

Bataanjr escribió:No avia que escribir tanta bobada.
Componentes es HD pero es Analogo.
HDMI es HD pero Digital.
Y digital es mejor que analogo punto.Y por si alguien pregunta el VGA es HD pero tambien es Analogo y es peor que el componente.

Será "habia" en lugar de avia.

Si el VGA es analogico, no analogo. Lo que pasa que en muchos televisores la entrada VGA, stá capada a 1368x760, no recuerdo exactamente la cifra pero es algo asi...

ale210 escribió:

Bataanjr escribió:No avia que escribir tanta bobada.
Componentes es HD pero es Analogo.
HDMI es HD pero Digital.
Y digital es mejor que analogo punto.Y por si alguien pregunta el VGA es HD pero tambien es Analogo y es peor que el componente.

Será "habia" en lugar de avia.

Si el VGA es analogico, no analogo. Lo que pasa que en muchos televisores la entrada VGA, stá capada a 1368x760, no recuerdo exactamente la cifra pero es algo asi...

1360 x 768 el ocho lo cambiaste de lugar jejejejeje

jfrgr escribió:

ale210 escribió:

Bataanjr escribió:No avia que escribir tanta bobada.
Componentes es HD pero es Analogo.
HDMI es HD pero Digital.
Y digital es mejor que analogo punto.Y por si alguien pregunta el VGA es HD pero tambien es Analogo y es peor que el componente.

Será "habia" en lugar de avia.

Si el VGA es analogico, no analogo. Lo que pasa que en muchos televisores la entrada VGA, stá capada a 1368x760, no recuerdo exactamente la cifra pero es algo asi...

1360 x 768 el ocho lo cambiaste de lugar jejejejeje

jajaja, ya sabia yo que ese 768 no me quedaba mu fino......