Vamos a ver, para tildar una idea de descabellada, primero hay que saber todos los datos.
No se decía que no podría nunca leer un mini-DVD en una GameCube, que si los GOD, que si tal?
A ver:
Wikipedia-UMD escribió:Specifications
ECMA-365: Data Interchange on 60 mm Read-Only ODC - Capacity: 1.8 GB (UMD™) (as PDF)
* Dimensions: Approx. 65 mm (W) x 64 mm (D) x 4.2 mm (H)
* Diameter: 60 mm
* Maximum Capacity: 1.80 GB (Single-sided, dual layer)
* Laser wavelength: 660 nm (Red laser)
* Encryption: AES 128-bit
Wikipedia-DVD escribió:Technical information
DVDs are made from a 0.6 mm thick disc of polycarbonate plastic coated with a much thinner (reflective) aluminium layer. Two such discs are glued together to form a 1.2 mm double-sided disc. The substrates are half as thick as a CD to make it possible to use a lens with a higher numerical aperture and therefore use smaller pits and narrower tracks.
A single-layer DVD can store 4.7 Gbyte, which is around seven times as much a standard CD-ROM. By employing a red laser at 650 nm (was 780 nm) wavelength and a numerical aperture of 0.6 (was 0.45), the read-out resolution is increased by a factor 1.65. This holds for two dimensions, so that the actual physical data density increases by a factor of 3.5. DVD uses a more efficient coding method in the physical layer. CD's error correction, CIRC, is replaced by a powerful Reed-Solomon product code, RS-PC; Eight-to-Fourteen Modulation (EFM) is replaced by a more efficient version, EFMPlus, which has the same characteristics as classic EFM. The CD subcode is removed. As a result, the DVD format is 47 percent more efficient with respect to CD-ROM, which uses a "third" error correction layer.
Son el mismo laser, por tanto el mismo surco. Por tanto la misma lente.
¿Donde está el problema? Pues en el sistema de archivos, como les pasaba a los GOD's, pero vamos, os apresurais demasiado a decir "imposible", y demás, y luego con el tiempo se demuestra que en informática, imposible, no hay nada.