› Foros › Off-Topic › Miscelánea
angelillo732 escribió:@Valmont tranquilo, cuando tengamos pruebas de que Rusia está llevando a cabo un genocidio, mi opinión cambiará, mientras tanto lo que dices no tiene sentido ninguno.
https://twitter.com/VOANews/status/1603518508855623680
https://twitter.com/Rinegati/status/1603521524060897280
https://twitter.com/BPartisans/status/1 ... 4314979329
https://twitter.com/oldirtyronin/status ... 8315809795
https://twitter.com/AlvaroDel_Gado/stat ... 2265694216
https://twitter.com/AlvaroDel_Gado/stat ... 6836637697
https://twitter.com/NOELreports/status/ ... 1775959040
https://twitter.com/Feher_Junior/status ... 6798148629
https://twitter.com/visionergeo/status/ ... 2446985230
https://twitter.com/TodoSeraUcrania/sta ... 6717339668
https://twitter.com/CRNICASMILITAR1/sta ... 1843547137
https://twitter.com/CRNICASMILITAR1/sta ... 1305354240
https://twitter.com/WarMonitors/status/ ... 1834418176
Pararegistros escribió:angelillo732 escribió:@Valmont tranquilo, cuando tengamos pruebas de que Rusia está llevando a cabo un genocidio, mi opinión cambiará, mientras tanto lo que dices no tiene sentido ninguno.
No sé si eres un cachondo, un flamer, si vives en una realidad alternativa paralela... o qué sé yo...
¿Esto qué es? ¿Preparando el terreno para plantar flores?
¿Y ésto? ¿Redecorando los residenciales con estética vintage?
Y a estos niños se los están llevando de excursión, ¿verdad?
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international ... 857_4.html
angelillo732 escribió:@Valmont tranquilo, cuando tengamos pruebas de que Rusia está llevando a cabo un genocidio, mi opinión cambiará, mientras tanto lo que dices no tiene sentido ninguno.
yakumo_fujii escribió:Puede ser un comentario cabron como un comentario desafortunado, todo depende de una realidad que nunca se informara.
Desde un punto de vista jurídico, el genocidio, ya sea cometido en tiempo de paz o en tiempo de guerra se considera un delito de derecho internacional. Tanto la Convención para la Prevención y la Sanción del Delito de Genocidio de 1948 como el Estatuto de Roma de la Corte Penal Internacional (CPI) de 1998 recogen una idéntica definición:
Se entenderá por “genocidio” cualquiera de los actos mencionados a continuación, perpetrados con la intención de destruir total o parcialmente a un grupo nacional, étnico, racial o religioso como tal:
A) Matanza de miembros del grupo;
B) Lesión grave a la integridad física o mental de los miembros del grupo;
C) Sometimiento intencional del grupo a condiciones de existencia que hayan de acarrear su destrucción física, total o parcial;
D) Medidas destinadas a impedir nacimientos en el seno del grupo;
E) Traslado por la fuerza de niños del grupo a otro grupo.
En el lenguaje común, sin embargo, el término tiene un significado diferente, tal como viene recogido por la Real Academia Española:
Genocidio: Exterminio o eliminación sistemática de un grupo social por motivo de raza, de religión o de política.
Este segundo significado es el que mueve a muchas personas a calificar como genocidio determinadas matanzas de personas que, en realidad, no se ajustan al tipo penal del delito de genocidio definido internacionalmente.
yakumo_fujii escribió:Puede ser un comentario cabron como un comentario desafortunado, todo depende de una realidad que nunca se informara.
javitronik escribió:yakumo_fujii escribió:Puede ser un comentario cabron como un comentario desafortunado, todo depende de una realidad que nunca se informara.
Recuerda que hay gente que defiende a muerte el humor negro. Libertad de expresión y tal lo llaman.
Así de pronto me viene el nombre de Carrero Blanco, por ejemplo.
Lo que está claro es que el comentario no puede ser mas desafortunado. Por no decir otra cosa.
El único buen hacer es mantener prisioneros para poder negociar, si eso no interesa, no hay que ser cruel, tiro en la cabeza y fuera
yakumo_fujii escribió:@seaman Quiero pensar que sea desafortunado, pero lo que esta claro que se puede coger de dos maneras, mas si no hay una aclaracion directa.
Yo veo al señor de atras indignado con el comentario, pero a la que se hecha la mano a la cara se le ve la sonrisa claramente, se indigna?, se descojona?, es mas de lo mismo.
Saludos.
seaman escribió:yakumo_fujii escribió:@seaman Quiero pensar que sea desafortunado, pero lo que esta claro que se puede coger de dos maneras, mas si no hay una aclaracion directa.
Yo veo al señor de atras indignado con el comentario, pero a la que se hecha la mano a la cara se le ve la sonrisa claramente, se indigna?, se descojona?, es mas de lo mismo.
Saludos.
Pero a ver, que no es un cómico dando un monólogo, que es un político de un país que está asesinando gente porque si donde violan y matan niños.
Que aclaración necesitas para saber si es una sobrada.
angelillo732 escribió:pero mucha gente empieza a pedir escalada por que es algo "necesario" eliminar a Rusia del mapa.
angelillo732 escribió:Pararegistros escribió:angelillo732 escribió:@Valmont tranquilo, cuando tengamos pruebas de que Rusia está llevando a cabo un genocidio, mi opinión cambiará, mientras tanto lo que dices no tiene sentido ninguno.
No sé si eres un cachondo, un flamer, si vives en una realidad alternativa paralela... o qué sé yo...
¿Esto qué es? ¿Preparando el terreno para plantar flores?
¿Y ésto? ¿Redecorando los residenciales con estética vintage?
Y a estos niños se los están llevando de excursión, ¿verdad?
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international ... 857_4.html
Esto me parece populismo al mismo nivel que hacía Rubén Gisbert cuando fue a Ucrania, llorando delante de un edificio bombardeado cuando sacaban a civiles, ignorando que al otro lado Rusia estaba haciendo lo mismo.
Eso amigo mío, está a años luz de lo que hacían los nazis y por supuesto de limpiezas étnicas.
Si tomas todo como verdad directamente, pues mal vamos, ser el invadido recuerdo que no da derecho a saltarse los derechos humanos y seguro que en la progaganda rusa también hablan de limpiezas étnicas y nazis, en referencia a Ucrania.
Esto ya debería dar una pista sobre cuando uno tiene que sentarse a pensar lejos de todo el ruido.
Aquí tenemos una invasión, y eso hay que condenarlo, pero no usando la propaganda como arma, ya que esa propaganda al final los gobiernos la usan para todo, deberíamos exigir más rigor en los medios.
seaman escribió:yakumo_fujii escribió:Puede ser un comentario cabron como un comentario desafortunado, todo depende de una realidad que nunca se informara.
¿En serio? Comentario desafortunado que les van a tirar cohetes a niños que solo quieren celebrar la navidad.javitronik escribió:yakumo_fujii escribió:Puede ser un comentario cabron como un comentario desafortunado, todo depende de una realidad que nunca se informara.
Recuerda que hay gente que defiende a muerte el humor negro. Libertad de expresión y tal lo llaman.
Así de pronto me viene el nombre de Carrero Blanco, por ejemplo.
Lo que está claro es que el comentario no puede ser mas desafortunado. Por no decir otra cosa.
Dios, lo mismo es si, hablar de un asesino que de un niño pequeño que solo quiere celebrar la navidad. Telaza.
Russian generals such as Grigory Zass described the Circassians as "subhuman filth", and glorified the mass murder of Circassian civilians,[1][12][13] justified their use in scientific experiments,[14] and allowed their soldiers to rape women.[1]
The invasion of Dagestan resulted in the displacement of 32,000 Dagestani civilians. According to researcher Robert Bruce Ware, Basayev and Khattab's invasions were potentially genocidal, in that they attacked mountain villages and destroyed entire populations of small ethno-linguistic group
whether the Holodomor constitutes a genocide remains in dispute.[11][12][13] Some historians conclude that the famine was planned and exacerbated by Joseph Stalin in order to eliminate a Ukrainian independence movement.[14][15] This conclusion is supported by Raphael Lemkin.[16]
[...]
Since 2006, the Holodomor has been recognized by Ukraine[30] alongside 22 countries, as a genocide against the Ukrainian people carried out by the Soviet regime.[31]
Pararegistros escribió:angelillo732 escribió:Pararegistros escribió:
No sé si eres un cachondo, un flamer, si vives en una realidad alternativa paralela... o qué sé yo...
¿Esto qué es? ¿Preparando el terreno para plantar flores?
¿Y ésto? ¿Redecorando los residenciales con estética vintage?
Y a estos niños se los están llevando de excursión, ¿verdad?
https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international ... 857_4.html
Esto me parece populismo al mismo nivel que hacía Rubén Gisbert cuando fue a Ucrania, llorando delante de un edificio bombardeado cuando sacaban a civiles, ignorando que al otro lado Rusia estaba haciendo lo mismo.
Eso amigo mío, está a años luz de lo que hacían los nazis y por supuesto de limpiezas étnicas.
Si tomas todo como verdad directamente, pues mal vamos, ser el invadido recuerdo que no da derecho a saltarse los derechos humanos y seguro que en la progaganda rusa también hablan de limpiezas étnicas y nazis, en referencia a Ucrania.
Esto ya debería dar una pista sobre cuando uno tiene que sentarse a pensar lejos de todo el ruido.
Aquí tenemos una invasión, y eso hay que condenarlo, pero no usando la propaganda como arma, ya que esa propaganda al final los gobiernos la usan para todo, deberíamos exigir más rigor en los medios.
¿Populismo? Ucrania bastante tenía con defenderse en el momento en que el youtuber asalariado del Kremlin llegó para enseñar el paripé del Donbas como para ponerse a bombardear zonas independentistas sistemáticamente como está haciendo el o*** de VVP.
Que hayan podido caer proyectiles no guiados ahí, sobre todo cuando no tenían los HIMARS... puede ser, no te lo niego... Que sistemáticamente se entretengan en atacar residenciales e infraestructura civil como hacen los o***s... Pues va a ser que no.
Tu error de bulto es poner a ambos al mismo nivel.
Y no te equivoques... Los r**kis son especialistas en genocidios, sobre todo con ucranianos (el Holodomor), sus gulags para disidentes... y los polacos (la masacre de Katyn).
angelillo732 escribió:
Hasta que no acabe la guerra no vamos a saber realmente lo que ha pasado ya que la propaganda de guerra lo cubre todo.
O Dae_soo escribió: La equidistancia en una guerra nunca tuvo buenos resultados porque aunque pierden todos siempre hay 2 bandos :El malo y el menos malo
angelillo732 escribió:@Pararegistros entonces cada guerra es un genocidio, EEUU también hizo genocidio en Iraq y Afganistán.
Creo que no sabes lo que es una guerra y lo que supone un escenario así, la de ejecutados que hay es una barbaridad. No se hasta que punto los soldados rusos están ejecutando, pero desde luego, aquí hace falta investigar más por que las fotos random no valen desgraciadamente.
Hasta que no acabe la guerra no vamos a saber realmente lo que ha pasado ya que la propaganda de guerra lo cubre todo.
Pararegistros escribió:angelillo732 escribió:@Pararegistros entonces cada guerra es un genocidio, EEUU también hizo genocidio en Iraq y Afganistán.
Creo que no sabes lo que es una guerra y lo que supone un escenario así, la de ejecutados que hay es una barbaridad. No se hasta que punto los soldados rusos están ejecutando, pero desde luego, aquí hace falta investigar más por que las fotos random no valen desgraciadamente.
Hasta que no acabe la guerra no vamos a saber realmente lo que ha pasado ya que la propaganda de guerra lo cubre todo.
No chico. Gracias a Dios no sé lo que es una guerra de primera mano, más que lo que oía de mis abuelos o de algunas alumnas. Pero eso no implica que no sepa que es un genocidio. Las BARBARIDADES y crímenes de guerra puntuales que haya podido cometer EEUU en Irak, Afganistán... y voy más lejos, Somalia, Vietnam y Corea... NI DE COÑA SON UN INTENTO DE ELIMINACIÓN SISTEMÁTICA DE LA POBLACIÓN Y DE LOS GRUPOS ÉTNICOS COMPLETOS.
Querer poner a ambos países a la misma altura es un error de bulto, cuando no, una treta torticera para intentar manipular.
EDITO:
Ahhh... La payasada del día... 🤡
Misiles rusos caen junto a Volgogrado (Rusia).
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.pravda ... /index.amp
Vamos VVP... elimina a los agresores de la Madre Rusia. Véngala. 😂😂😂😂😂
El Danés escribió:O Dae_soo escribió: La equidistancia en una guerra nunca tuvo buenos resultados porque aunque pierden todos siempre hay 2 bandos :El malo y el menos malo
¿Cuál era el bando menos malo en la guerra de Vietnam?
¿La dictadura del sur apoyada por la democrática USA?
¿La dictadura del norte apoyada por las dictaduras china y soviética?
Ukraine: Russia’s unlawful transfer of civilians a war crime and likely a crime against humanity – new report
Russian forces tortured and deported civilians from Ukraine
Children separated from families after forcible transfer
Older people, people with disabilities, and children struggle to leave Russia
Russian authorities forcibly transferred and deported civilians from occupied areas of Ukraine in what amounted to war crimes and likely crimes against humanity, Amnesty International said in a new report published today.
The report, “Like a Prison Convoy”: Russia’s Unlawful Transfer of Civilians in Ukraine and Abuses During ‘Filtration’, details how Russian and Russian-controlled forces forcibly transferred civilians from occupied Ukraine further into Russian-controlled areas or into Russia. Children have been separated from their families during the process, in violation of international humanitarian law.
Civilians told Amnesty International how they were forced through abusive screening processes – known as ‘filtration’ – which sometimes resulted in arbitrary detention, torture, and other ill-treatment.
Russia’s deplorable tactic of forcible transfer and deportation is a war crime
Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General
“Separating children from their families and forcing people hundreds of kilometres from their homes are further proof of the severe suffering Russia’s invasion has inflicted on Ukraine’s civilians,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.
“Since the start of their war of aggression against Ukraine, itself an international crime, Russian forces have indiscriminately attacked and unlawfully killed civilians, destroyed countless lives, and torn families apart. No one has been spared, not even children.
“Russia’s deplorable tactic of forcible transfer and deportation is a war crime. Amnesty International believes this must be investigated as a crime against humanity.
“All those forcibly transferred and still unlawfully detained must be allowed to leave, and everyone responsible for committing these crimes must be held accountable. Children in Russian custody must be reunited with their families, and their return to Ukrainian government-controlled areas must be facilitated.”
Amnesty International documented cases in which members of specific groups – including children, older people and people with disabilities – were forcibly transferred to other Russian-occupied areas or unlawfully deported to Russia. In one case, a woman was separated from her 11-year-old son during filtration, detained, and not reunited with him, in clear violation of international humanitarian law.
People detained during filtration told Amnesty International they had been subjected to torture and other ill-treatment, including being beaten, electroshocked and threatened with execution. Others had been denied food and water, with many held in dangerous and overcrowded conditions.
Amnesty International interviewed 88 people from Ukraine. The majority were civilians from Mariupol, as well as civilians from the Kharkiv, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. Most, especially those from Mariupol, described coercive conditions that meant that they had no meaningful choice but to go to Russia or other Russian-occupied areas.
Amnesty International considers Russia’s annexation of Ukrainian territory, including the so-called ‘Donetsk People’s Republic’ (DNR) in the Russian-controlled part of Donetsk Region, to be illegal.
Forcible transfer from Mariupol
In early March 2022, the south-eastern city of Mariupol was completely surrounded by Russian forces, making evacuations impossible. The city was subjected to near-constant bombardment, and civilians lacked access to running water, heat or electricity.
Thousands of people were able to evacuate the city towards Ukrainian government-held areas in mid-March, but as Russia gradually occupied the city, it forcibly transferred some civilians in neighbourhoods under its control, cutting them off from other escape routes. Civilians said they felt coerced to go on ‘evacuation’ buses to the DNR.
Milena, 33, told Amnesty International her experience while trying to flee Mariupol: “We started to ask questions about evacuation, where it is possible to go… I was told [by a Russian soldier] that it was only possible to go to the DNR or to Russia. Another girl asked about other possibilities [to evacuate], for instance to Ukraine… The answer came straight away, the soldier interrupted and said, ‘If you don’t go to the DNR or the Russian Federation, you will stay here forever’.”
Milena’s husband, a former marine with the Ukrainian military, was detained soon afterwards while crossing the border into Russia, and has not yet been released.
Forcible transfer of children and other at-risk groups
The laws of armed conflict prohibit the individual or mass forcible transfer of protected persons, including civilians, from occupied territory. In several cases, children fleeing without parents or other guardians towards Ukrainian-held territory were stopped at Russian military checkpoints, and transferred into the custody of Russian-controlled authorities in Donetsk.
As mentioned, an 11-year-old boy was separated from his mother during filtration, which violates international humanitarian law. The boy and his mother were captured and detained from the Illich Steel and Iron Works in Mariupol in mid-April by Russian forces.
They told me I was going to be taken away from my mom… I was shocked…
An 11-year-old boy who was separated from his mother
Q2: Why and how are Ukrainians going to Russia?
A2: Since the invasion, 2,772,010 Ukrainian refugees have been recorded crossing the border into Russia. Some report voluntarily moving through Russia as a means of eventually reaching the European Union. However, there are more troubling reports of forcible transfers of Ukrainians to Russia or Russian-occupied regions as Moscow tries to rid eastern Ukraine of people sympathetic to Kyiv. Long feared as a tactic of war Putin’s Russia would be willing to deploy, more concrete allegations were made public during a UN Security Council meeting in September, during which U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield stated that between 900,000 and 1.6 million Ukrainians had been “interrogated, detained and forcibly deported” to Russia. Many of these people are from eastern Ukraine, specifically the Mariupol and Kharkiv regions near the Russian border. Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield went on to say that “there is mounting and credible evidence that those considered threatening to Russian control because of perceived pro-Ukrainian leanings are ‘disappeared’ or further detained.”
A recent Human Rights Watch report provides such credible evidence, showing that Ukrainians are being rounded up by Russian authorities before being forced to go through an intense screening process referred to as “filtration,” during which they are subjected to body searches, biometric data collection, interrogation about their political views, and at times, beatings. Those deemed to have connections to the Ukrainian military or nationalist groups are reportedly taken into detention centers in Russian-controlled territory. The rest are put onto buses to Russia—despite some Russian officers lying about the buses being destined for other parts of Ukraine. These victims of state-sponsored forced transfer—which constitutes war crimes and potentially crimes against humanity—have been sent as far as Khabarovsk and Vladivostok in the far eastern reaches of Russia.
Many Ukrainians who fled or were forcibly transferred into Russia have faced difficulties returning to Ukraine. For example, those traveling with undocumented family members (including newborns) or without accepted documentation (or only electronic documentation, commonly used and accepted in Ukraine) have been unable to leave Russia. Many of those who went through the filtration and forced transfer have had their identity documents confiscated or were forced to sign papers renouncing Ukraine, tactics which have made it more difficult for these people to leave Russia and return home.
Q3: How many people have returned to Ukraine?
A3: While there is no clear data documenting how many of the 7.5 million Ukrainian refugees have returned home permanently, as of September 20, 2022, there have been over 6 million cross-border movements back into the country. Border crossing points in Poland and Romania receive the majority of the traffic, with nearly 4.5 million crossings from Poland and nearly 1 million from Romania. The security situation remains volatile in Ukraine, so while some may be returning permanently, others are crossing the border to check on property, visit family members, or collect belongings and documents, and then return to their accommodations. These pendular movements can be expected to continue at least until the war ends and likely for some time afterwards.
Pararegistros escribió:@Arizmendi
¡Vaya! ¡Hoy tenemos el día del cachondeo en el hilo!
Te lo voy a ilustrar con lo que dice Amnistía Internacional.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/ ... ew-report/Ukraine: Russia’s unlawful transfer of civilians a war crime and likely a crime against humanity – new report
Russian forces tortured and deported civilians from Ukraine
Children separated from families after forcible transfer
Older people, people with disabilities, and children struggle to leave Russia
Russian authorities forcibly transferred and deported civilians from occupied areas of Ukraine in what amounted to war crimes and likely crimes against humanity, Amnesty International said in a new report published today.
The report, “Like a Prison Convoy”: Russia’s Unlawful Transfer of Civilians in Ukraine and Abuses During ‘Filtration’, details how Russian and Russian-controlled forces forcibly transferred civilians from occupied Ukraine further into Russian-controlled areas or into Russia. Children have been separated from their families during the process, in violation of international humanitarian law.
Civilians told Amnesty International how they were forced through abusive screening processes – known as ‘filtration’ – which sometimes resulted in arbitrary detention, torture, and other ill-treatment.
Russia’s deplorable tactic of forcible transfer and deportation is a war crime
Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General
“Separating children from their families and forcing people hundreds of kilometres from their homes are further proof of the severe suffering Russia’s invasion has inflicted on Ukraine’s civilians,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.
“Since the start of their war of aggression against Ukraine, itself an international crime, Russian forces have indiscriminately attacked and unlawfully killed civilians, destroyed countless lives, and torn families apart. No one has been spared, not even children.
“Russia’s deplorable tactic of forcible transfer and deportation is a war crime. Amnesty International believes this must be investigated as a crime against humanity.
“All those forcibly transferred and still unlawfully detained must be allowed to leave, and everyone responsible for committing these crimes must be held accountable. Children in Russian custody must be reunited with their families, and their return to Ukrainian government-controlled areas must be facilitated.”
Amnesty International documented cases in which members of specific groups – including children, older people and people with disabilities – were forcibly transferred to other Russian-occupied areas or unlawfully deported to Russia. In one case, a woman was separated from her 11-year-old son during filtration, detained, and not reunited with him, in clear violation of international humanitarian law.
People detained during filtration told Amnesty International they had been subjected to torture and other ill-treatment, including being beaten, electroshocked and threatened with execution. Others had been denied food and water, with many held in dangerous and overcrowded conditions.
Amnesty International interviewed 88 people from Ukraine. The majority were civilians from Mariupol, as well as civilians from the Kharkiv, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. Most, especially those from Mariupol, described coercive conditions that meant that they had no meaningful choice but to go to Russia or other Russian-occupied areas.
Amnesty International considers Russia’s annexation of Ukrainian territory, including the so-called ‘Donetsk People’s Republic’ (DNR) in the Russian-controlled part of Donetsk Region, to be illegal.
Forcible transfer from Mariupol
In early March 2022, the south-eastern city of Mariupol was completely surrounded by Russian forces, making evacuations impossible. The city was subjected to near-constant bombardment, and civilians lacked access to running water, heat or electricity.
Thousands of people were able to evacuate the city towards Ukrainian government-held areas in mid-March, but as Russia gradually occupied the city, it forcibly transferred some civilians in neighbourhoods under its control, cutting them off from other escape routes. Civilians said they felt coerced to go on ‘evacuation’ buses to the DNR.
Milena, 33, told Amnesty International her experience while trying to flee Mariupol: “We started to ask questions about evacuation, where it is possible to go… I was told [by a Russian soldier] that it was only possible to go to the DNR or to Russia. Another girl asked about other possibilities [to evacuate], for instance to Ukraine… The answer came straight away, the soldier interrupted and said, ‘If you don’t go to the DNR or the Russian Federation, you will stay here forever’.”
Milena’s husband, a former marine with the Ukrainian military, was detained soon afterwards while crossing the border into Russia, and has not yet been released.
Forcible transfer of children and other at-risk groups
The laws of armed conflict prohibit the individual or mass forcible transfer of protected persons, including civilians, from occupied territory. In several cases, children fleeing without parents or other guardians towards Ukrainian-held territory were stopped at Russian military checkpoints, and transferred into the custody of Russian-controlled authorities in Donetsk.
As mentioned, an 11-year-old boy was separated from his mother during filtration, which violates international humanitarian law. The boy and his mother were captured and detained from the Illich Steel and Iron Works in Mariupol in mid-April by Russian forces.
They told me I was going to be taken away from my mom… I was shocked…
An 11-year-old boy who was separated from his mother
PD: Revisa esas cifras de 3 MILLONES DE REFUGIADOS que casi no han llegado tantos ni a toda Europa junta... Bájate de la moto, anda... Te has colado en casi 300.000 y encima FORZADOS.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/update-fo ... nd-ukraine
Q2: Why and how are Ukrainians going to Russia?
A2: Since the invasion, 2,772,010 Ukrainian refugees have been recorded crossing the border into Russia. Some report voluntarily moving through Russia as a means of eventually reaching the European Union. However, there are more troubling reports of forcible transfers of Ukrainians to Russia or Russian-occupied regions as Moscow tries to rid eastern Ukraine of people sympathetic to Kyiv. Long feared as a tactic of war Putin’s Russia would be willing to deploy, more concrete allegations were made public during a UN Security Council meeting in September, during which U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield stated that between 900,000 and 1.6 million Ukrainians had been “interrogated, detained and forcibly deported” to Russia. Many of these people are from eastern Ukraine, specifically the Mariupol and Kharkiv regions near the Russian border. Ambassador Thomas-Greenfield went on to say that “there is mounting and credible evidence that those considered threatening to Russian control because of perceived pro-Ukrainian leanings are ‘disappeared’ or further detained.”
A recent Human Rights Watch report provides such credible evidence, showing that Ukrainians are being rounded up by Russian authorities before being forced to go through an intense screening process referred to as “filtration,” during which they are subjected to body searches, biometric data collection, interrogation about their political views, and at times, beatings. Those deemed to have connections to the Ukrainian military or nationalist groups are reportedly taken into detention centers in Russian-controlled territory. The rest are put onto buses to Russia—despite some Russian officers lying about the buses being destined for other parts of Ukraine. These victims of state-sponsored forced transfer—which constitutes war crimes and potentially crimes against humanity—have been sent as far as Khabarovsk and Vladivostok in the far eastern reaches of Russia.
Many Ukrainians who fled or were forcibly transferred into Russia have faced difficulties returning to Ukraine. For example, those traveling with undocumented family members (including newborns) or without accepted documentation (or only electronic documentation, commonly used and accepted in Ukraine) have been unable to leave Russia. Many of those who went through the filtration and forced transfer have had their identity documents confiscated or were forced to sign papers renouncing Ukraine, tactics which have made it more difficult for these people to leave Russia and return home.
Q3: How many people have returned to Ukraine?
A3: While there is no clear data documenting how many of the 7.5 million Ukrainian refugees have returned home permanently, as of September 20, 2022, there have been over 6 million cross-border movements back into the country. Border crossing points in Poland and Romania receive the majority of the traffic, with nearly 4.5 million crossings from Poland and nearly 1 million from Romania. The security situation remains volatile in Ukraine, so while some may be returning permanently, others are crossing the border to check on property, visit family members, or collect belongings and documents, and then return to their accommodations. These pendular movements can be expected to continue at least until the war ends and likely for some time afterwards.
Pero mejor aún... te pregunto mejor... ¿POR QUÉ SALEN LOS RUSOS DE RUSIA COMO LAS RATAS QUE ABANDONAN UN BARCO QUE SE HUNDE?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_e ... of_Ukraine
700.000 nada más que para evitar los reclutamientos y los que han salido urgentemente antes vía Turquía, Georgia, Finlandia... ya tienes por ahí algo más de 1 millón de huidos de "la Madre Patria"... SUPONGO QUE SE ESTÁN ROBANDO A LOS UCRANIANOS PARA REPONER LO QUE PIERDEN Y A LOS QUE LES FRÍEN EN LA GUERRA... Las gallinas que entran por las que van saliendo, como diría José Mota.
O Dae_soo escribió:angelillo732 escribió:
Hasta que no acabe la guerra no vamos a saber realmente lo que ha pasado ya que la propaganda de guerra lo cubre todo.
Yo si quieres te digo cómo empezará el relato de la guerra de Ucrania dentro de muchos años cuando todo haya acabado : "El presidente de Rusia decidió voluntariamente invadir un país soberano e independiente" . A partir de ahí Ucrania lucha por no desaparecer apoyada por muchos países liderados por EEUU y la OTAN. Empieza la guerra y en TODAS la guerra ocurren actos inhumanos que sacan lo peor del ser humano.
Por favor, si hacemos el relato con la cronología adecuada, podremos adjudicar las responsabilidades correctas a quien ha decidido empezar ésta mierda. La equidistancia en una guerra nunca tuvo buenos resultados porque aunque pierden todos siempre hay 2 bandos :El malo y el menos malo
Pararegistros escribió:@Arizmendi
Lo que te he citado, son 277.000 y CASI TODAS FORZADAS, salvo los cuatro gatos del Donbas y de Crimea que han salido a pata de caballo cuando las cosas se estaban poniendo feas.
Te he citado dos fuentes mucho más fiables sobre la verdadera naturaleza de las "vacaciones" que los rusos le están dando a los DEPORTADOS FORZOSOS (niños a los que separan de sus padres y se los dan en adopción a familias rusas, TAL COMO HACÍAN LOS NAZIS EN POLONIA, RUSIA... en especial si eran rubitos y de ojos azules).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidnappin ... zi_Germany
No me vengas con cuentos de viejas que no cuelan.
Arizmendi escribió:Pararegistros escribió:@Arizmendi
Lo que te he citado, son 277.000 y CASI TODAS FORZADAS, salvo los cuatro gatos del Donbas y de Crimea que han salido a pata de caballo cuando las cosas se estaban poniendo feas.
Te he citado dos fuentes mucho más fiables sobre la verdadera naturaleza de las "vacaciones" que los rusos le están dando a los DEPORTADOS FORZOSOS (niños a los que separan de sus padres y se los dan en adopción a familias rusas, TAL COMO HACÍAN LOS NAZIS EN POLONIA, RUSIA... en especial si eran rubitos y de ojos azules).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kidnappin ... zi_Germany
No me vengas con cuentos de viejas que no cuelan.
O sea que según tu el principal medio de información de este país (y un medio pro-OTAN) a inflado el numero de refugiados en Rusia en 2.600.000..
Y tu hablabas de cachondeo, si es que no se para que te entro al trapo..
El Danés escribió:
¿Cuál era el bando menos malo en la guerra de Vietnam?
¿La dictadura del sur apoyada por la democrática USA?
¿La dictadura del norte apoyada por las dictaduras china y soviética?
angelillo732 escribió:@dlabo es que al final, en las guerras modernas lo básico es atacar comunicaciones e infraestructura, pero lejos de lo que pudiera parecer, normalmente no tiene un impacto crítico en la población, al final el ser humano es mucho más duro de lo que parece.
Piensa que la humanidad ha vivido el 99% de su existencia sin luz, ni calefacción, ni agua corriente, etc..
dlabo escribió:Pero Rusia si que esta cometiendo un genocidio con los ataques a instalaciones energéticas, y lo sé de primera mano, por que lo he visto, vamos.
La mayor parte de las controversias acerca del Holodomor surge alrededor de la cuestión de si la hambruna fue un objetivo intencional del poder y si tuvo motivos étnicos para llamarse genocidio.
El día que deshumanizas al enemigo es el día en el que tú también pierdes la humanidad
QUE SE REPITIERA EL CHRISTMAS TRUCE de 1914 en 2022