http://www.voanews.com/english/news/asi ... 63244.htmlMe quedo con estos quotes:
Nuclear energy analyst Robert Alvarez of the Institute for Policy Studies says there are many things we do not know about the failure, including whether the containment structure is fully intact. "The information that has been made public, particularly by the Japanese nuclear safety authorities, certainly indicate that radioactive elements from the fuel itself have escaped and entered the environment. And even if the reactor maintains its integrity, there's a possibility that things like open relief valves on the top of the reactor and things like that may still release large amounts of radioactivity," he said.
Ken Bergeron, a physicist who formerly worked for Sandia National Laboratories, says a so-called station blackout - which involves the loss of both off-site electricity and on-site backup power from diesel generators - is viewed in the nuclear industry as extremely unlikely. But he says it happened.
"So we're in uncharted territory. We're in the land where probability says we shouldn't be. And we're hoping that all of the barriers to release of radioactivity will not fail," he said.
Crews are pumping a mixture of seawater and boron to cool the reactor, and these experts say it is essential to keep the water flowing for several days. Analyst Alvarez called the use of seawater a "Hail Mary pass", a term from American football meaning an act of desperation. But he said that with enough water pumped at sufficient volume and rate, the reactor can be stabilized.
Ira Helfand of the group Physicians for Social Responsibility says the reactor contains huge levels of radioactivity that cannot be allowed to escape. "The bottom line is that we just don't know what's going to happen over the next couple of days. And frankly, neither do the people who are operating these power plants. They're very complex systems that are clearly way of whack, and whether they're going to be able to contain the radiation inside the reactors or not, is simply not known at this point," he said.
En resumen, según expertos nucleares estadounidenses: falta información, la situación es extraordinariamente adversa, mediante el método de bombear agua se puede estabilizar el reactor y no es posible predecir cómo evolucionará la situación.
RED_BULLL escribió:vamos a ver señores
yo he sido uno de los que ha comentado lo que se estaba diciendo en tercer milenio
no es que iker jimenez ni sus palmeros esten hablando de sus conocimientos (nulos) sobre energia nuclear
si no que un japones del gobierno, el japones es encargado de las energias de japon o algo asi, ha emitido un comunicado hace 15 min a un peridico americano, lo de la posible fusion del nucleo
bienvenidos a la nave del misterio
![[sonrisa]](/images/smilies/nuevos/risa_ani1.gif "sonrisa")
si es mentira, sera la ultima vez que los escuche
"Periódico" (Agencia de información): NIKKEI
Japonés del gobierno: Agencia NISA (Agencia de Seguridad Nuclear e Industrial)
Artículo:
http://e.nikkei.com/e/fr/tnks/Nni20110312D12JFF03.htmSin embargo, antes han puesto un link que cuestiona la veracidad de la noticia.
![[+risas]](/images/smilies/nuevos/risa_ani3.gif "más risas")
). Para que se pare el reactor no tendrían que bajar las barras de control para que éstas "atrapen" al máximo número de neutrones, haciendo que así la reacción no continúe? ![[buaaj]](/images/smilies/nuevos2/vomitivo.gif "mas potas")
![[boing]](/images/smilies/nuevos/pelota_ani1.gif "pelota")
